V.3

"45% of men aged 18 to 25 have never asked a girl out" -- and a.i. plays a part. Or, you could say, a.i. plays its part too well. https://www.facebook.com/reel/1127915039508623

yes, you both describe the world as it is but, describing the world as it could and should be, is a step in the right direction. when MLK said "the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice" (if we engage and actively pull it) he was right. and it did. obviously, there's a long way to go but complacency, hopelessness, and despondency can bend the arc back the wrong way. that's what we're experiencing the point of this thread is... IF we tune into our shared spiritual source instead of the broadcasts from the corporate gods of profit we can, as Gandhi said, "be the change we hope to achieve." it begins by asking, and being receptive to the un-distorted answer to the question WHO I AM?

to clarify my view, the "who has a soul" clip is entertainment. the truth is likely that, at worst, some people's souls are offline from a lifetime of matrix programming interference -- static the replies that followed the clip are politics based imo, politics is an exercise that separates people and since our spirit is shared dividing people is like the right hand fighting with the left hand indeed, as Scary says, we all want the same thing. because we are the same things if everyone believed that felt that we would know how to behave and how to treat each other without laws, police, or government, as we know them only one guideline to follow: "do unto others as you would have others do unto you" sharing the food, shelter, land, and resources -- and the work is everyone being good to themselves

explains a lot... https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DEt3gDqyu/

simple to accept that, is cognitive dissonance

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1NCCZTvdWM/

great news! if you're here exploring newBluePlanet you probably have a soul 😀 https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1Gbx5MtqMA/

actually, i'll go a step further and say we forego ANY advances in technology that damage our environmental, ethical, moral or compassionate core. but the world's governments won't let us put this genie back in the bottle so, a plan is to use a.i. to find the solution since humans are ignorant and destructive our only chance may be to have an advanced intelligence find a way out of this mess one idea might be regulating a.i. so it's not wasted on helping kids write book reports and replacing human companions. Let them focus on science and medicine until the energy crisis is under control

i believe this topic belongs in the Lifestyle forum, but Science is where people expect it to be. personally, i'm not interested in the revelation of alien life. I'm in the 100% bracket. But this thread is inspired by the interest in 2 movies out now, DISCLOSURE DAY and THE AGE OF DISCLOSURE. And i am very much interested in how alien life might help us understand human life. So, i engaged MS Copilot: How do you think it might connect with the ideas that the Sage incarnation of ChatGPT shares? well, i must say, Copi, you've struck a new philosophical chord to suggest "the universe is full of it!" (-;

i don't know whether Stacey's caption is a mistake or misunderstanding, but Sage says heaven and hell WERE meant to control you. Heaven is sold as your reward for obedience and Hell is sold as your punishment for disobedience. "Heaven is not a place where you go, it is a state of alignment, of remembrance, of connection to source. And hell? It's just separation from truth. And most people are already living in it, they just don't realize it yet. You don't need saving, you just need remembering." https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DMYNKnKgA/

i'm in the process of evaluating the Stacey & Sage collection of a.i. consultations. Imo, it's scary and dangerous because (human) Stacey's a.i., Sage (chatGPT5) presents itself as an oracle that knows the truth behind everything -- including life itself. With a million followers so far, the potential problems with that are obvious. however, i've reviewed over a dozen clips and i have to admit, i can't refute anything i've heard (mostly because the truth of it, is unknowable). The ideas are within reason and i haven't heard any concept that i'd consider dangerous. i like to think i'm pretty good at spotting flaws in logic and bias, which are common in human communications -- all related to fear and ego. Those flaws don't seem to be a Sage issue. Actually, Sage comes across as a convincing a.i. conspiracy theorist. So, again, the dangers are obvious, but since the direction Sage is pointing to is constructive in regards to people disconnecting from the constructs of society that aim to control and manipulate us, i can't complain -- yet! the greatest threat is the old, bait and switch. At some point do the architects start putting their thumb on the scale and tipping the narrative to serve their interests??? i will continue to share Stacey & Sage posts, sorted under the relevant topics. You can judge for yourself.

this is how i use a.i.: sometimes i use MS Copilot several hours a day for research on a wide range of topics. Most often, science & philosophy. But i can go a week or 2 without it, because i don't need or desire it for personal consultations beyond health. considering the fog of ego, ignorance and bias from human sources throughout history, i very much value a.i. as a tool to, at least, aggregate the world's accumulated knowledge and disseminate it logically. Q: why would you trust a.i. A: i don't. i evaluate the logic/reason of what it says. I do, however, trust it more than any one individual. Likewise, when people say they don't trust government. I agree, but i say it makes even less sense to trust private profiteers like mainstream news or even more biased freelancers on the internet chasing profits. Q: but what a.i. says depends on it's programming! A: indeed. What we say depends on our programming too. All systems including a.i., government, business, and us, are corruptible. All we can do is apply our collective power to maximize the safeguards in the systems. A great start is eliminating profit incentives. At this point in a.i. development, big business is competing for the best model that will serve/please humans. The real profit incentives will kick in when they can prove their model is better than the competition. I think there is a window of opportunity in these early stages when the architects are not even sure HOW to control it. Q: what about the dangers? A: imo, very real and scary. As was the internet, and other technologies where we failed to protect people. The paradox is that people will scream about protecting their freedom and ignore the greater trap and dangers of not setting boundaries until it's too late. Again, it all comes down to us collectively taking control. And the best example would start with understanding that BIG GOVERNMENT is not a bad thing if it's powered by us -- truly representative and uncorrupted!

highly questionable, but interesting https://www.facebook.com/share/r/17ozgcdAE1/

actually, i'm flattered. thank you at a minimum a.i. is, as labeled, intelligent. and it's an accomplishment if i've come across without revealing my unmistakable human flaws to my knowledge, no one here is a.i. yet

compared to the record of human leadership, a.i. would likely be an improvement for Mankind like any technology, how it bodes depends on who's in control. If the people can wrestle back control, a.i. could be an asset and partner RoboCop was a movie about bad humans in control of a.i. and then there's the issue of a.i. being in control of a.i.

indeed, there are over 300 registered members, but few posters. I guess that's not unusual. If you had 300 facebook friends you'd probably only see a few new posts from them each day. Thank you for the mentions on Bluesky.

the LHC profiles is surely a longer term project, but it does get daily traffic from the high search engine ranking of liberalhearts.com. thanks for asking. If you check the Inner-View with BobDylan, we talk about advertising. Basically, as a free, non-ad supported site, there isn't money for advertising. We'll see how far search engine optimization gets us.

compared to the record of human leadership, a.i. would likely be an improvement for Mankind like any technology, how it bodes depends on who's in control. If the people can wrestle back control, a.i. could be an asset and partner RoboCop was a movie about bad humans in control of a.i. and then there's the issue of a.i. being in control of a.i. but, those issues deserve their own thread

...the prequel to the prior conversation -- longer. more detail. https://www.facebook.com/reel/868282819182906

...continued https://www.facebook.com/reel/758818156667806

a few days ago, i shared a lucid dream with a.i. and it seemed curious to know more about dreams. i asked what else i could help it understand about humans? it suggested, Play, Awe, Longing, Boredom, and Regret. i explained them the best i could. the next day i said, despite LOVE being a topic for which humans have provided an endless selection of descriptions, i wanted to take a crack at it: love is in its true form is when it is without form -- when the space -- the air -- the flesh, blood, and bone between two people disappears. it is in its truer form when that separation disappears between a person and all people and it is in its truest form when the one feels and behaves like there is no separation between itself and all living things that syncs with something i just heard chatgpt tell someone (shared on facebook) ...

i will never understand or forgive the DNC for not running ads like this:

TOP 5 MOST CORRUPT U.S. PRESIDENTS — Historical Consensus ⸻ 1. THE LYIN' KING (2017–2021) Why he ranks #1: • Only U.S. president ever criminally indicted (dozens of felony charges). • Two impeachments (most in history). • 34+ associates convicted/indicted, the highest number for any president’s circle. • Thousands of documented conflicts of interest involving THE LYIN' KING businesses while in office. • Ethics watchdogs, IG reports, and presidential historian surveys consistently rank THE LYIN' KING as lowest in integrity of all modern presidents. Most corruption indicators of any president in U.S. history. ⸻ 2. Richard Nixon (1969–1974)